Erlent
8.5.2009
ETUC: Nýr félagslegur sáttmáli Evrópu
Krefst ETUC að Ráðherraráðið og framkvæmdanefnd ESB dragi upp fjárfestingaráætlun sem nemi 1% af vergri þjóðarframleiðslu ESB. Þá vill ETUC styrkingu á velferðarkerfinu, á réttindum vinnandi alþýðu og aukna áherslu á sjálfbærar og umhverfisvænar lausnir. Seðlabanki Evrópu (ECB) er gagnrýndur fyrir að leggja eingöngu áherslu á stöðugleika verðlags en leita ekki lausna sem tryggja betri og fleiri störf. Þá gagnrýnir ETUC Alþjóðagjaldeyrissjóðinn (ASG) fyrir að neyða þjóðir til að lækka laun og skera niður opinber störf og félagsleg útgjöld sem gjald fyrir að þiggja neyðarlán sjóðsins. Þessi aðferðafræði dýpki kreppuna og að meðul sjóðsins geti orðið verri en sjúkdómurinn. Þá er framkvæmdanefnd ESB gagnrýnd fyrir að setja þau skilyrði fyrir lánveitingum úr jöfnunarsjóði ESB, að þær þjóðir sem á þeim þurfa að halda lúti skilyrðum AGS. Þannig veiki framkvæmdanefnd ESB beinlínis grundvöllinn fyrir „hinu félagslega kerfi Evrópu" (The European Social Model) í mörgum aðildarlöndum ESB.
Þá hafi aukið frelsi á fjármálamarkaði leitt til innbyrðis samkeppni ríkja ESB um að bjóða fyrirtækjum upp á sem hagstæðast skattaumhverfi. Þetta auki á ójöfnuð milli ríkja ESB og grafi undan tekjum ríkja og möguleikum ríkisstjórna á að takast á við kreppuna. Segir ETUC að ekki sé hægt að horfa aðgerðalaust á þessa þróun. „Við bjuggum ekki til sameiginlega mynt,til þess að verða áfram fórnarlömb verstu eiginleika hins alþjóðlega fjármálamarkaðar."
Leggur ETUC til að jöfnunarsjóður framkvæmdanefndar ESB (the European Commission's balance of payments fund) sem nu telji 50 milljarða evra, verði aðskilinn frá Alþjóðagjaldeyrissjóðnum. Skilyrðum ASG verði skipt út fyrir evrópsk skilyrði: fjárhagslegur stuðningur við aðildarþjóðir verði háður því skilyrði að „hið félagslega kerfi Evrópu" verði virt að fullu, sem leiði til meiri jöfnuðar og réttlætis í dreifingu gæða, sterkra réttinda launafólks og réttláts skattakerfis.
Evrópusamband verkalýðsfélaga telur 60 milljónir félaga í opinbera geiranum og á hinum almenna markaði í 36 löndum Evrópu. BSRB er aðili að ETUC sem og stærsta aðildasambandi þess, EPSU, Evrópusambandi starfsfólks í almannaþjónustu.
(Skjal ETUC er birt hér að neðan á ensku. sjá http://www.etuc.org/a/6136 )
1
ETUC: TOWARDS A NEW SOCIAL DEAL IN EUROPE
Executive Summary
The dominance of the neoliberal economic model over the past 30 years
has caused the economic catastrophe that Europe and the rest of the
world are now experiencing. Too many in the overblown, vastly expanded
financial services sector indulged in a modern day version of alchemy.
Long term prudence was ignored as greed and speculation became the
order of the day in Wall Street, London and other major financial centres.
The result before the crash was rapidly rising inequality, the growth of
precarious jobs and pressure to cut the influence of welfare states, worker
rights and collective bargaining. Now to that must be added growing
unemployment, cuts in public expenditure and a collapse in demand in
many countries.
To ease this situation, the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)
calls for a New Social Deal as a driver for social justice and more and
better jobs.
The ETUC, a key player at European level, is ready to take part in the
discussions and implementation of policies affecting social and
employment fields, and is on the offensive for a new social deal in
Europe. The ETUC calls for:
More and better jobs: Investment in an expanded European
recovery plan to mobilise a new drive for growth and jobs. The ETUC
demands the European Council and Commission to draw up a European
investment plan totalling an annual 1% of GDP to provide more and better
jobs, to promote innovation, research and development, to help
employment in key industries, to invest in new, green and sustainable
technologies, and to maintain vital public services.
Stronger welfare systems to provide more security and avoid
social exclusion. The ETUC demands a meaningful and a strong
European Social agenda: to maintain people in jobs with robust income
and to ensure protection to workers as well as an appropriate training.
Stronger workers' rights and an end to the dominance of the
short-termist market principles. Stronger rights are necessary to stop
the trend of rising inequality. The ETUC demands a Social Progress
Protocol giving priority to social rights and collective action and a stronger
Posted Workers Directive. The ETUC also calls for efficient workers'
participation and industrial democracy. Stronger workers' rights are
especially urgently required to stop the rising use of different forms of
insecure, non-standard work.
John Monks, General Secretary
Boulevard du Roi Albert II, 5 • B - 1210 Bruxelles • Tel: +32 2 224 04 11
Fax: +32 2 224 04 54 / 55 • e-mail: etuc@etuc.org • www.etuc.org
2
Better pay: stronger collective bargaining. Wage freezes and
nominal wage cuts are to be rejected. It is vital as demand collapses to
protect purchasing power. The ETUC is therefore seeking a strengthening
of collective bargaining and wage formation institutions with the European
Central Bank (ECB) also committed to more and better jobs. The ECB
must be involved in growth and full employment, not just price stability.
The ETUC demands an advisory board of European social partners to the
ECB.
European solidarity as a protection against the excesses of
financial capitalism: Effective regulation of financial markets, a fair
distribution of wealth, and no return to casino capitalism or to the
‘business as usual' of the past 20 years in financial markets is crucial. The
ETUC demands a major increase in European social spending enlarging
the activities of the European structural funds, notably the European
Social Fund and the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. Tax
competition coming from deregulated markets must also be tackled
because it threatens Social Europe.
3
EUROPE'S WORKERS NEED A NEW SOCIAL DEAL
Introduction
We are at a crossroads in history. The June elections of the European
Parliament will take place against the background of the worst economic
downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s. In the aftermath of
this Great Depression, conditions and institutions were created to make
sure such a collapse would not happen again and to obtain a long period
of economic growth. Collective bargaining, social dialogue and strong
trade unions were promoted and unemployment benefit systems were
strengthened so that the benefits of economic progress would be shared
by all. The European Economic Community was founded to strengthen
cooperation in Western Europe.
What will tomorrow's generation remember from today's crisis? Will they
remember that governments undertook major action to prevent this
recession from turning into a devastating job crisis? That politicians finally
took up the responsibility to put a halt to the model of ‘casino capitalism'
with its excessive risk taking, its corporate greed, and its speculation? Or
will they see 2009 as a year in which the opportunity to stop the crisis
from amplifying itself was squandered by sticking to orthodox and dated
economic beliefs, when Europe could not join forces to invest its way out
of the crisis and to strengthen social cohesion and where we failed to
restore and strengthen trade union rights and collective bargaining?
The ETUC, representing millions of workers in Europe, calls for a New
Social Deal to help get us out of the crisis and to make Europe emerge
from it with an economy and a society that are stronger, more equal,
based on social justice and social cohesion, creating more and better jobs,
investing in stronger welfare systems and evolving strongly to a low
carbon and more sustainable future.
Those who try to abuse the crisis as a means to boost their profits and
fortunes at the expense of workers will face the resistance of the
European trade unions.
4
THE NEW SOCIAL DEAL FOR EUROPE: WHAT ARE THE ETUC
DEMANDS
More and better jobs: Investment in an expanded European
recovery plan
European policy makers are not ambitious enough in addressing the crisis.
Many hope the recession is just a temporary ‘blip' and that strong growth
dynamics will return automatically and quickly. This is a major mistake.
We are confronted with a deep crisis of the model of financial capitalism
itself. This crisis of casino capitalism is structural. It will not go away on
its own.
Since debt loads of households, banks and business in many countries
have become excessive, private sector spending and investing is likely to
be depressed for several years to come. The logic of ‘creative destruction'
no longer holds. It is the logic of massive job destruction combined with
poor job creation that is on the rise.
To avoid this doomsday scenario from happening, Europe needs to
mobilise a new driver for growth and jobs. Investing to fight climate
change and in a green and sustainable future for Europe will spur growth
and create millions of new jobs.
The ETUC demands the European Council and Commission to draw up a
European investment plan totalling an annual 1% of GDP effort for the
next three years. Investment possibilities at the European level exist in
the areas of renewable energies, clean technologies, energy savings,
physical and social infrastructure and networks, materials of the future,
modern cars and clean transportation systems need to be identified.
These investments are to be the basis of a new European industrial
strategy ensuring a rapid and fair transition to a low carbon economy and
a more sustainable future.
To avoid an overburdening of member states' public finances and to
overcome the fact that several member states are themselves cut off from
access to affordable finance, this investment effort needs to be supported
at the European level itself. The European budget needs to be topped up
with the European Investment Bank's power to borrow on international
capital markets and all this needs to be backed up by European central
banks buying these debt bonds.
If these investments start to kick in from beginning next year, we can
hope to avoid much of the increase in unemployment that is expected to
take place over 2010. Moreover, these investments will have a multiplying
effect and they will strengthen economic activity and employment further
over time, thereby gradually bringing high unemployment rates back
down over the next years.
5
More security: Stronger welfare systems
Europe risks falling into mass unemployment and this will have major
consequences.
Workers in ‘precarious' employment are taking the first blows. Fixed term
work, now accounting for some 15% or even more of all employment
contracts, provides business in Europe with the ‘easy firing' some
employers are so keen to have. At the same time, workers with precarious
contracts are very poorly compensated for the flexibility they offer to
business. Although they are the first to be fired, workers on fixed term
and agency contracts usually suffer reduced or no access to redundancy
or unemployment benefits, have no access to additional company pension
arrangements and get paid lower wage rates than regular workers.
Moreover, inspired by the slogan of ‘making work pay', many member
states have reduced over the past decade benefit levels and benefit
duration while also making it more difficult to access unemployment
benefit systems. The hypothesis was that the hard core of structurally
unemployed had been reached. However, the crisis is now changing this
dramatically: skilled workers are now flooding into unemployment benefit
systems to find out that the level and the duration of these benefits no
longer provide a means to a decent living.
Finally, mass unemployment does not remain limited to workers with
precarious contracts; it is affecting the entire the work force. For some,
unemployment spells will be short and temporary. For others,
unemployment will become a regular or permanent experience. Workers
with lower qualifications and workers with a weak foothold in the labour
market will be particularly vulnerable.
To face all of these challenges, the ETUC demands a revival of Social
Europe. We urgently need a meaningful and strong European Social
Agenda covering the following policies:
- To maintain existing jobs and to avoid mass redundancies, Europe
needs to generalise short-time working schemes, provided a robust
income for workers is guaranteed. These schemes should also
function as a basis for models of internal flexicurity where job
security, working time flexibility, training and upwards transition
into better jobs in the same company are combined.
- Unemployment benefit systems need to be strengthened and
broadened. Replacement rates, eligibility criteria and limits on
benefit duration need urgent reconsideration and improvement.
Special attention must be given to workers in precarious contracts,
among them many young people, women and ethnic minority or
migrant workers, making sure that they also have sufficient access
to welfare systems.
6
- At the same time, member states need to step up investment in
training, retraining and in active labour market programmes. The
curse of unemployment needs to be turned around in an
opportunity for all workers to upgrade skills and have access to
lifelong learning, with particular attention going to employment
policies necessary to accompany labour market transitions to a
greener economy.
- Provided collectively agreed wages and working conditions are
respected, Member states also need to expand investment in public
services, in particular in social services of general interest. The
ageing of the population, the reduction of the gender employment
gap and the need to improve work/life balance requires greater
public efforts in many social services such as health care, elderly
care and child care. Here as well, unemployment should be turned
around in an opportunity to expand employment in these sectors
and answer pressing societal needs on a quality basis while
avoiding the crisis to become an alibi to turn women away from
paid employment into unpaid household work and voluntary activity
- With a new generation of young people entering a labour market
where the prospect of finding a job is very poor, it is urgent to offer
young people a guarantee of a job, further education or training,
apprenticeships or useful community services.
More security: Stronger workers' rights and an end to the
dominance of the ‘free market' principle over the right of workers
to organise and act
Workers' rights are not part of the problem; they are part of the solution.
Stronger workers' rights are urgent to stop the perverse distribution that
has been going on for many years. Reforms to weaken the bargaining
position of workers have created massive ‘rents' to be captured by vested
interests. While the share of wages and salaries in total national income
went down, the profit share systematically went up. Income inequalities
soared, not only in the Anglo - Saxon world but also in many European
continental countries.
Labour market reforms have also contributed to the rising use of different
forms of non-standard work. Despite the principles laid down in the
European Social Acquis - that non regular contracts should remain the
exception and not become the rule - long and exaggerated chains of fixed
term contracts continue to exist while agency work is sometimes used to
undercut other workers' wages in important parts of Europe. Practices like
these have nothing to do with the objective need for labour market
adaptation; they risk transforming what are basically stable and
productive jobs into insecure contracts paying poor wages.
Stronger rights for workers are necessary to stop these trends of rising
inequalities and precariousness and to make our society ‘whole'. Stronger
7
workers' rights will substitute ‘asset bubble' based demand dynamics with
a model of growth based on productive instead of speculative investment.
The ETUC demands:
- A Social Progress Protocol giving fundamental social rights
precedence over the economic freedoms of the single market. This
includes the collective right to organise, to undertake collective
action and to organise strikes.
- A revision of the Posting of Workers' directive, putting the principles
of ‘equal treatment' and ‘equal pay for equal work' at its core.
- A dispute settlement system and the creation of a specific chamber
at the European Court of Justice, with the participation of the social
partners, devoted to social and labour problems
- The strengthening of the content of the Tripartite Social
Concertation and of the Macro Economic (Social) Dialogue.
- A proper consultation of the European Social Partners in the
framework of Article 138 EC for every (legislative) proposal that
might have an impact on and/or concern social policy in general
and the rights of workers and their representatives in particular.
- Stronger workers' participation and industrial democracy to give
workers a say in managing the current crisis at company level, to
make sure massive lay offs are avoided and to be able to anticipate
future restructuring. Participation rights must become an
constitutive and integrated part of corporate governance and of
European company law. Stronger involvement of workers in
company policy avoids a management style focussed on short term
objectives with negative repercussions on workers. It contributes
instead to the long term sustainability of the enterprise.
Addressing the segmentation of labour markets by upgrading the
protection of precarious contracts implies a rapid decision on the
Temporary Agency Directive. Furthermore, the implementation of the
European fixed term work agreement of 1999 at national level needs to be
strengthened in several countries. Finally, a European legal instrument to
ensure that main contractors can be held liable jointly with their
subcontractors for the payment of wages and social security contributions
needs to be developed.,
8
Better pay: Stronger collective bargaining
A collapse of wage dynamics would intensify the making of the New
Depression. Contrary to the popular myth that wages and collective
bargaining in Europe are rigid, the risk is that wage restraint turns into
wage cuts, causing low inflation to tip over into deflation. If this happens,
then the downwards spiral is complete. A continuous fall in the level of
prices will drag down spending and investments while pushing real
interest rates upwards in the midst of a recession and against a
background of excessive private sector debt loads. Debt deflation, similar
to the 1930's, would then certainly be on the cards.
To prevent Europe's workers from undercutting each others' wages,
thereby triggering deflation and depression, the ETUC demands a
strengthening of collective bargaining and wage formation institutions.
Wage freezes and nominal wage cuts are to be strongly rejected. Instead,
real wage increases are to be promoted with the aim of making wages an
anchor of price stability in these times of looming deflation.
In the context of the European Employment Strategy a European
framework for ‘fair and decent' wages needs to be developed. Its
objective is to encourage Member states together with the national social
partners, to conduct policies and establish collective bargaining practice
putting strong downwards floors in wage dynamics. This implies setting
wage floors for the lowest wages to make sure there's a the bottom in the
labour market under which wages can not fall and avoid a situation in
which low wages become poverty wages. On top of this, it also implies
respecting and promoting ‘going' wage rates and wage increases as
agreed to in collective bargaining agreements.
It is also necessary to stop the perverse practice of rewarding bankers
and CEOs for failing and putting their company or bank at risk through
super dividend pay outs, equity capital buy backs and excessive
borrowing. A European wide crackdown on excessive CEO bonuses and
remuneration, on stock options and golden parachutes as well as on super
dividend pay outs and capital buy-back operations is not only necessary
but also urgent.
European solidarity as a protection against the vagaries of
financial capitalism
Financial markets and Wall Street rating agencies were wrong when they
poured the world's savings into what now turns out to be ‘toxic' assets.
We should not trust these markets and their bias against socially
corrected economies now that they are bidding up interest rate spreads of
several members against German bunds1. This is burdening public
1 Besides Wall Street rating agencies' bias in favour of deregulated and privatised economies, there are
other reasons as well: Headquarters of Western European banks are restricting credit flows to their
Eastern European subsidiaries to drive down their debt positions, there's a flight into German bunds
9
finances and this at a time when governments need increased access to
affordable loans in order to manage the social and economic
consequences of the crisis.
At the same time, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), in return for
emergency loans, is forcing countries to cut wages, public employment
and social spending. These structural adjustment programs work to
deepen the crisis even further and the IMF's cure can be worse than the
disease. The Commission's balance of payment fund is only accessible if
countries implement the reforms imposed by the IMF. In this way, the
Commission itself is in the business of weakening the European Social
Model in several member states.
Another threat to Social Europe is the tax competition coming from
deregulated international capital markets. When capital moves freely
around, international groups are able to play member states off against
each other and orient capital and investment flows to these countries
where they get the best conditions. In the past this has led to tax
competition between member states trying to attract investment flows
and the unfolding crisis may accelerate this kind of ‘beggar thy neighbour'
policy even further. This, again, threatens to undermine government
revenue and to limit the possibilities of governments to face the crisis.
Europe can not sit by and watch all of this happen. We did note create a
single currency in order to continue to be at the mercy of the worst
features of international financial markets.
To start with, the European Commission's balance of payments fund, now
representing 50 billion euro should be operated separately from the IMF.
IMF conditionalities need to be replaced by European conditionalities:
financial support for member states has to make sure the European Social
Model is respected to the fullest extent, with distributive justice, robust
workers' rights and fair tax systems taking centre stage.
The game of tax competition in the internal market, undermining the
revenue basis of governments, has to stop. We urgently need a European
agenda to address tax havens, zero or near zero taxes, flat tax regimes
and to coordinate closely on corporate profit tax systems, capital gain
taxes and taxes on high fortunes.
Here, Europe needs to take another step forwards. Europe can only face
this crisis if it stands together. This implies a major increase in European
social spending, enlarging the activities of the European Social Funds and
the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, and making sure all workers
in all countries and regions have a social safety net to fall back on. In the
same vein, Europe also needs to put in place a ‘low carbon economy
adaptation' fund to accompany the labour market changes implied by the
because the market for these bunds is bigger and more liquid, and a general risk aversion redirects
capital flows away from these countries
10
fight against climate change (supporting mobility and training for green
jobs). The European budget, now representing less than 1% of European
budget, needs substantial beefing up. The ETUC proposes that this be
done by introducing European level taxes, for example a tax on financial
speculation or a tax on super dividend pay outs.
Finally, Europe can not limit itself to coordinate national financial markets'
regulatory authorities. The European financial market place needs a single
European level regulator, along with specific effective regulation for hedge
funds and private equity, mandatory registration and supervision of credit
rating agencies and a European credit rating agency. On the international
level, the Commission should play a leading role in constructing a new
global, transparent and accountable financial architecture, involving the
Financial Stability Board, the G 20, the IMF and the World Bank as well as
the ILO. On both the European as well as the international level, social
partners have to be closely involved.
An independent and unbiased European Central Bank also
committed to more and better jobs
The ETUC stands firmly behind the European single currency. The euro
has brought Europe many advantages.
However, the way the ECB has been handling the crisis is disappointing.
The ECB should have cut interest rates earlier and more vigorously to
ward off the economic meltdown. Even now, with the economy in a deep
recession and with the spectre of deflation looming, the ECB is resisting
the use of all instruments it has to stimulate the economy. Fearing once
again that inflation is around the corner, the ECB is reluctant to adopt
"quantitative easing" and to bring interest rates on government bonds
further down so that more room for fiscal stimulus is created.
The bias in favour of inflation fighting policies can also lead the ECB to the
erroneous view that labour market deregulation and a weakening of
workers' rights are necessary to create jobs. Over the past years, the ECB
has indeed attacked public institutions which promote workers' interests
such as minimum wages, wage indexation, public sector wages and job
protection legislation.
The euro is too important to leave to central bankers. The ETUC therefore
demands an advisory board of European social partners to the European
Central Bank. Central bankers can no longer lock themselves up in an
ivory tower. They need to confront economic reality and there's no better
way to do so than to have regular and systematic contacts and
discussions with trade unions and employer organisations.
Finally, the European Central Bank needs to address the worrying trend of
high interest rates spreads inside the euro area. Low, almost non existing
differences in interest rates have been a main advantage of the creation
of the single currency and this advantage has now disappeared. The ECB
11
has the power to restore this benefit of the single currency by buying
those bonds showing excessive interest rate spreads with the German
bond.
Erlent
Á döfinni
Leit
























